Tuesday, October 4, 2022

 







5 Carbon Neutral Technologies for Hydrogen Generation

When reading the lines that follow, please start from the fundament that $/kW are not the only reference for measuring the cost-benefit of an energy carrier. If a cheap, easy to get energy carrier – call it petroleum derivates- cost us to lose the planet, then the dollar amount per kW losses ground as point of reference and alternatives like a clean hydrogen energy carrier become the low-cost, option of preference after all.

Contrary to most common understanding, CO2 neutral hydrogen can be produced through several, many methods. For the hydrogen economy to be carbon-neutral we are not stuck with electrolysis that has been classified as a capital intensive, energy intensive process.   Although the several ways to produce hydrogen have in common the need to separate it from other elements [1].

 

CO2 Neutral methods

Carbon free hydrogen can be produced in several manners, but only a few methods have received attention because are considered commercially viable. These processes can be classified as:

a. Electrolytic processes.

b. Biological processes that rely in microbial biomass conversion, or photobiological conversion;

c. Photoelectrochemical processes that rely on direct solar water splitting.

d. Thermochemical processes that rely on high temperature dissociation of hydrogen from other components and recycling of the original species. [2]

 

1.      Photobiological: The use of microorganisms and sometimes organic matter and sunlight is harnessed to produce hydrogen. This technology may provide economical hydrogen production from sun light with low- to net – zero carbon emissions. The attractiveness of this method relies in those algae that grow in non-drinkable water or wastewater can potentially be used to generate hydrogen [3]

o   In photolytic biological systems, microorganisms such as green microalgae or cyanobacteria use sunlight to split water into oxygen and hydrogen.

o   The challenge of this process results from being able to capture the hydrogen ions and combine them to be released as hydrogen gas. Simultaneously being able to safely extract the oxygen without creating explosive mixtures.

o   Another challenge is finding a way to increase the rates of hydrogen production to make it commercially viable.

o   The process also presents a low Solar-to-Hydrogen (STH) efficiency.

o   Researchers are looking at ways of changing the normal biological pathways of bacteria involved in the process to increase the rate of hydrogen production.

o   There are 2 methods for photobiological production of hydrogen.

§  Direct photobiological where hydrogen is generated from the activity of hydrogenase without intermediate molecules. Just picture a population of algae at the bottom of a pond at night. There is respiration going on but not photosynthesis. There are mostly anaerobic conditions. When light first hit, water splitting starts. A few minutes follow before light activates the enzymes for the carbon fixing reaction. The electrons produced by the water splitting would destroy the organisms if the excess energy were not dissipated. A second reaction combines the electrons and protons to form hydrogen molecules, thus getting rid of the excess energy. This short period of time which only lasts for a few minutes is what scientists need to tap, since once enough oxygen builds up, the algae switches to carbon fixation to provide the food source.

§  Indirect photobiological where hydrogen is generated after the storage of carbohydrates or glycogen [4]

2.      Photoelectrochemical: Semiconductors are used to convert energy directly into chemical energy in the form of hydrogen. The semiconductors used are like those used in photovoltaic electricity generation but immersed in a water-based electrolyte. Sunlight energizes the water splitting process [5]

o   The process offers the potential for high conversion at low operating temperatures

o   Compared to an electrolysis system (65% eff) operated from a 12% PV system, the electrolysis results in a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of 7.8%; while a direct photo electrolysis system (operating at an equivalent 1.45 V) can have a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of 10.2% [6]

o   Furthermore, this system eliminates the need for costly electrolytic cells.

3.      Photovoltaic electrolysis: A study at the University of Illinois at Urbana [7] demonstrated a system where two polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysers in series with one InGaP/GaAs/GalnNAsSb triple junction solar cell produced a large enough voltage to drive electrolysis. The Solar to Hydrogen (STH) efficiencies achieved reached between 28% and 32%. The STH efficiency depends on Jsc, the short -circuit photocurrent density, nf, the Faradaic efficiency for hydrogen evolution and P, the incident illumination power density; all measured under standard solar illumination power density [8]. A metallic coating then brings out the conversion of water to hydrogen. On the semiconductor surface, water is oxidized to oxygen by the hole (h+}   A solar cell is a semiconductor device which can be represented as a PN junction diode which operates by the Photovoltaic Effect [9]. The production of multi-layer solar cells presents challenges since lattice matching of layers is essential for output efficiency. It is a case for ease of growth of layers. To fabricate a cell with a larger number of junctions, lattice mismatching becomes an issue for the free flow of electrons and “holes”. The use of 3J cells makes fabrication simpler and leads to acceptable efficiencies.

4.      Photocatalysis: A Photocatalysis process is the result of a chemical reaction that is initiated by photons. Several semiconductors have been reported to catalyze the decomposition of water. In the process, a semiconductor absorbs the solar radiation (light) and excites electrons from the valence band of the semiconductor moving them into the conduction band [10]. Recently, Zn-dopped K2La2Ti3O10 has been found to have high photocatalytic activity for hydrogen production under exposure to visible light. Another photocatalytic material using visible light is Cr3+-dopped Bi4Ti3O12. Hydrogen evolution was measured at 8 L/m2 using a more complex sulfur compound.

5.      Thermochemical: Decomposition into hydrogen is carried out through the enabling of cyclic chemical reactions. There is a substantial number of redox reactions that can be used in a cyclic manner to product hydrogen. Only a handful of them have been considered due to practical reasons. I general and simplified terms, there is a two-step process for decomposition that can be represented as:

XO à X + 1/2O2

X + H2O à XO + H2

Therefore, in theory the species XO can be reused and recycled through the process over and over. Incomplete reactions and side reactions bug the system and require the continuous addition of fresh material, as well the elimination of impurities through auxiliary systems resulting in overall efficiencies reduced drastically. A thermochemical cycle using CuCl has been proposed and studied at UOIT in Oshawa ON have been performed. The cycle requires temperatures in the range of 550 oC. For this reason, it was considered a good candidate to tie into nuclear plants for the efficient use of wasted heat. [11]. The copper-chlorine cycle became increasingly attractive due to the temperature requirements being in range with wasted heat from some industries and nuclear energy operations. The same temperatures can be obtained from solar concentrators using a field of mirror heliostats [12]. The cycle was initially designed without electrolysis, but eventually evolved in the need for inclusion of electrolysis due to increased complexity and side reactions. The overall cell reaction is given by:

2CuCl(aq)+2HCl(aq)→2CuCl2(aq)+H2(g)

The efficiency of the electrolytic process depends as expected on electrode materials, membrane performance and electrolytic solution [13]

 

Conclusions:

Clean hydrogen production is arguably expensive and perhaps inefficient as some debates insist with powerful arguments based on the status of things. We have grown used to fulfill our thirst for convenient energy from sources that are cheap, practical, and for which we have learned and established the infrastructure for the last 100 years or more. Petroleum derivates, gasolines, natural gas have become so cheap that every other possibility to generate, store or transport energy is quickly seen as expensive, unpractical. The hydrogen economy won’t come cheap for our pocket, but highly profitable for the health of the planet. It will force us to change our unhealthy, gobbling habits of energy consumption.

 Clearly if we continue to measure other alternatives against the existing status quo, we will probably stay there. The real cost and practicality of alternatives such as hydrogen as energy carrier needs be measured in terms of the cost-benefit equation. If the alternative energy carrier is generated without generating pollution, without destroying our environment and jeopardizing life in the planet, then the dollar per kW figure is meaningless and losses weight.

References

 

 

1.       Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; Hydrogen Production: Natural Gas Reforming; https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-production-natural-gas-reforming ; Aug 10, 2021

2.       Maximiliam B.G, Claudio C., John A. S. and John W.Solar Thermochemical Hydrogen (STCH) processes, Electrochemical Society Interface 27 53, 2018

3.       Bringing Thermochemical Water Splitting to the Next Level, DLR Institute of Solar Research, HEST-HY

4.       Roshan Sharma et al, Hydrogen production using photobiological methods; DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-78242-361-4.00010-8, July 2015

5.       Hydrogen Production: Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting; Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office; Washington DC

6.       D Brent MacQueen, Photochemical Water Splitting GCEP Hydrogen Workshop, April 2019, Stanford University, SRI international, Menlo Park CA.

7.       Jieyang Jia et al, Solar Water Splitting by Photovoltaic-Electrolysis with a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency over 30%, Nature Communications, Oct 31 2016. DOI 10.1038/ncomms13237

8.       On the Solar to Hydrogen Conversion Efficiency of Photoelectrodes for Water Splitting, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, pubs.acs.org/JPCL,

9.       Sanat Pandey, GE/GaAS/InGaP Triple Junction Solar Cells fro Space Exploration, Department of electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA, April 2019

10.   K. S. V Santhanan et al, Introduction to Hydrogen Technology, 2018 John Wiley & Sons, www.wiley.com/go/santhanam/hydrogentech_2e

11.   Gabriel D Marin. Kinetics and Transport Phenomena in the Chemical Decomposition of
Copper Oxychloride in the Thermochemical Cu-Cl Cycle, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, UOIT, April 2012

12.   Thermochemical Water Splitting, Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Technology Office, https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-production-thermochemical-water-splitting , Sept 2, 2021

13.   Copper Chlorine Cycle, https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/cu-cl-cycle, Sept 2, 2021.